Years later, I watched clips of Zemeckis's Beowulf film for my English class. My teacher mostly showed us so that we could make fun of the awkward adaptation. In addition to its bizarre casting (Angelina Jolie?), the film was made laughable by its use of the same photorealistic animation technology. Perhaps this allowed Zemeckis to use more special effects, but mostly I think it just made the movie even more uncomfortable and agonizing to sit through.
While I count myself as a big animation fan and praise Zemeckis for attempting to incorporate new animation technologies into his films, I think he should give up on this photorealistic system. The films he has made with it are just bad and, I think, that is largely because of the Uncanny Valley effect of the image-capture animation. Why can't he just use live actors? It seems that would produce better results, especially if he is already having them act the part and just capturing the performance with computers. What is it that makes him want to promote such a type of filmmaking, where the actors feel even more disconnected and icy? Even as an animated film this technology is uncomfortable. One of the reasons I love animated films is that, with unique drawing and artistic techniques, they can have individual, beautiful styles and aesthetics. Zemeckis's movies, though, are not stylized enough (like, for instance, James Cameron's Avatar) and not human enough (like, for instance, any live action film) to make for a comfortable viewing experience. They are all occupying space in the Uncanny Valley.
Related article on NPR here.
Creepy:
No comments:
Post a Comment